Photogravure vs. iPhone

Photogravure first began in 1814 when Joseph-Nicephore Niepce was experimenting with light sensitivities. At this time, people were motivated to solve the technical problems early “cameras” brought about. According to the Art of Photogravure, Niepce was able to print a portrait on a lithographic plate which was coated in light sensitive gelatin to expose positive film. Then, William Henry Fox Talbot used a resin powder which gave the plate an even tint to prevent fading over time. Eventually, the Pictorialism Movement came from photogravure which involved heavily manipulating the printing process. By the end of World War II photogravure was retired and made way for the less expensive rotogravure.

Photogravure affected photojournalism through the process. Each and every improvement and motivation was done for creating the best looking image, with the best performing camera. Today, photojournalists use some of the best cameras invented. Because of photogravure, photography became recognized as a fine art. Thus, photojournalists today are respected, important, and can make a living out of their work. Without the process that led to this conclusion, photojournalism would not be raising such issues like it does. Also, photographers strived for quicker developing of images. The photogravure was a whole process of many different, precise steps. Today, photojournalists click their button and have the image immediately on the memory card. There is no longer the need for a caravan of equipment other than for enjoyment like Quinn Jacobson. Without struggle, there is no triumph.

The difference between photogravure and my iPhone picture taking process leaves me speechless. I have always taken my iPhone for granted. But after just studying photogravure, the process seemed daunting. Not only was precision significant, the pure time it took was tiresome. First of all, I just got up and took two steps outside to take my photo. This was impossible with all the heavy equipment and rooms needed with photogravure. Also, I pressed one button on my camera which did all the autofocusing and lighting change on its own. Now I am able to do whatever I want with this picture, even print out a physical copy. With photogravure, the pictures would be grainy and fade. It is also interesting that I do not have to change the lens on my iPhone. Instead it adjusts naturally, unlike the single lens reflex cameras that Professor Nordell mentioned.

I am currently having an epiphany about how incredible and easy camera technology has become. There is such a contrast between the handheld device I use to take pictures and George Eastman’s equipment. According to Professor Nordell, Eastman wanted to take photos of his vacation in Santo Domingo but there was no way to get his equipment there. I am thankful for the early inventors and photojournalists. The Civil War introduced depicting everyday life through photography and today it seems like everyday life is the majority of what is being photographed on iPhones and what I am able to do.


Image By: Bruce Kapson
Image Source: http://brucekapson.com/site/category/copper?detail=true


Image By: Jennifer Page
Image Source: http://www.capefearpress.com/photointagliodef.html


iPhone photo